legalethicscases blogspot.com

legal ethics cases

Thursday, March 03, 2005. AC No 1372. June 27, 2002. SPOUSES LIRIO U. RABANAL AND CAYETANO D. RABANAL, complainants, vs. ATTY. FAUSTINO F. TUGADE, respondent. MENDOZA, J. After a review of the records of this case, the Court finds no basis for reversing the findings and recommendation of the IBP and the OBC. Their recommendation is affirmed with the modification that the penalty imposed is reduced from one 1 year to six 6 months. Respondent claims that he was not the counsel of complainant Cayetan.
traffic

OVERVIEW

This web page legalethicscases.blogspot.com currently has a traffic ranking of zero (the lower the superior). We have explored five pages inside the domain legalethicscases.blogspot.com and found zero websites referring to legalethicscases.blogspot.com.
Pages Crawled
5

LEGALETHICSCASES.BLOGSPOT.COM RANKINGS

This web page legalethicscases.blogspot.com has seen a fluctuation levels of traffic within the past the year.
Traffic for legalethicscases.blogspot.com

Date Range

1 week
1 month
3 months
This Year
Last Year
All time
Traffic ranking (by month) for legalethicscases.blogspot.com

Date Range

All time
This Year
Last Year
Traffic ranking by day of the week for legalethicscases.blogspot.com

Date Range

All time
This Year
Last Year
Last Month

LINKS TO WEB SITE

WHAT DOES LEGALETHICSCASES.BLOGSPOT.COM LOOK LIKE?

Desktop Screenshot of legalethicscases.blogspot.com Mobile Screenshot of legalethicscases.blogspot.com Tablet Screenshot of legalethicscases.blogspot.com

LEGALETHICSCASES.BLOGSPOT.COM HOST

Our parsers identified that a lone page on legalethicscases.blogspot.com took four hundred and two milliseconds to come up. We could not find a SSL certificate, so our crawlers consider legalethicscases.blogspot.com not secure.
Load time
0.402 secs
SSL
NOT SECURE
Internet Protocol
172.217.9.225

WEBSITE IMAGE

SERVER OS AND ENCODING

I found that this domain is operating the GSE server.

PAGE TITLE

legal ethics cases

DESCRIPTION

Thursday, March 03, 2005. AC No 1372. June 27, 2002. SPOUSES LIRIO U. RABANAL AND CAYETANO D. RABANAL, complainants, vs. ATTY. FAUSTINO F. TUGADE, respondent. MENDOZA, J. After a review of the records of this case, the Court finds no basis for reversing the findings and recommendation of the IBP and the OBC. Their recommendation is affirmed with the modification that the penalty imposed is reduced from one 1 year to six 6 months. Respondent claims that he was not the counsel of complainant Cayetan.

CONTENT

This web page legalethicscases.blogspot.com states the following, "Thursday, March 03, 2005." We saw that the webpage said " RABANAL, complainants, vs." It also said " After a review of the records of this case, the Court finds no basis for reversing the findings and recommendation of the IBP and the OBC. Their recommendation is affirmed with the modification that the penalty imposed is reduced from one 1 year to six 6 months. Respondent claims that he was not the counsel of complainant Cayetan."

SEEK SIMILAR DOMAINS

Legal Ethics Consulting, P.C.

What should I do if a client complains about me to the ARDC? What should I do if my admission to the bar is declined? How do I know if my duty to report is triggered? How can an ethics evaluation help my malpractice case? Rule 8.

Legal Ethics

This website contains information relating to legal ethics composed by Globe Education Network paralegal students to benefit attorneys, paralegals, and the general public. DISCLAIMER - THE CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. Tuesday, March 15, 2011. Hiring a Non-Lawyer With Intent to Split Fees- Summarized by Student Samantha Hamm.

Legal Ethics in Motion Legal Ethics in the Digital Age

On Mar 29, 2018 in Attorney-Client Relationship. More recently, lawyers have increasingly been doing so by way of online platforms. To read the full opinion, click here.