Sunday, March 18, 2007. Hey Colin,i found your paper interesting and it was relative to the main question. i found it a little confusing when it started talking about high and low productivity stands and how long to leave them for. i understand that high productivity plantations will suck up more carbon but what would be the point of low productivity plantations if there is imiting space for trees? See you on Kamloops public transit system! Hi Colin,I realize that your artic.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007. I was interested to learn that dense stands are better for carbon sequestration. The article I reviewed also said that a lifespan of around 30 years was best for storing carbon. The research in this article was quite extensive and the authors made some sound and useful conclusions.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007. Thank you for your comments and opinion. I do agree that with more information the paper does have some amazing tools within it which could help to answer our main question. Even with all of the different reviews which have been written in the last couple of weeks on this topic, we could probably make a good estimated guess on how to deal with the carbon problem which our world is being faced with. Answer To Your Comments! 183; V.

Saturday, April 9, 2011. Saturday, March 26, 2011. Wednesday, March 16, 2011. I like a little adventure, even if that includes sitting in the middle of the beeline highway on a beautiful spring day.